I did a few more interviews today Jamaica, and on my way home ran into Matt Trezza at 34th St. Matt graduated the journalism school this past May, and graduated Johns Hopkins with me in 2002. He is still looking for a television job and was on his way to do a little freelance video work for his local television station.
Because I had a couple hours to kill, I decided to go to B&H to check out there DVD video cameras. It was extraordinarily enlightening, and I spoke with one of the rep for a while about the future of digital filmmaking and the pros and cons of recording on a DVD.
The rep told me to check out camcorderinfo.com, a web site run by Robin Liss that has reviewed a lot of video cameras and that Robin has borrowed many of them from B&H. So I went to her web site and wrote her this lengthy e-mail which I think conveys a lot of my enthusiasm for the next step in digital filmmaking:
----------Email to Robin-----------
I'm really interested in digital video, and have been shooting and editing on my computer for over five years. Recently, I've been researching the new DVD camcorders and I'm absolutely amazed that they have not already revolutionized the industry. The ability to shoot on a nonlinear format seems to me one of the biggest improvements that can happen in digital video, yet it seems there are no future plans for a professional grade DVD camcorders, only the Hitachi, Sony, and Panasonic models are available.
The main thing that I have in mind is shooting a documentary somewhere far away where one might not have (or want to bring) a computer to edit video in the field. What usually happens is you go out, spent several months shooting interviews or whatever, and then come home to find you have shot over 100 hours of footage. What a pain in the ass to edit, and then editing usually takes six months or a year to log, and figure out what the hell is going on.
The way I see it, DVD camcorders (or being able to record digital video on a nonlinear medium such as a memory stick) can cut the time spent logging and editing in half. Once you can take a five-minute interview, divided into three segments, and then delete the first minute in the last 3 1/2 minutes, both freeing up space on the DVD as well as trimming unnecessary footage, makes postproduction far more efficient. What I am most amazed with is, even if the DVD format isn't widely accepted or isn't professional enough or isn't high enough quality, it offers the ability to actually create a rough assembly cut in the camera. You could be sitting on the subway coming home from a shoot, editing footage and piecing it together in minutes.
I am a student at the Columbia school of journalism and I've been coming together some radio piece is recently on my MiniDisc recorder, while everyone else in my class has to suffer using a Marantz tape recorder. On my trips home from a daybook assignment, I'm able to insert tracks into long interviews and by the time I get back to the studio to write my script, I already have several of my actualities ready to go.
The other amazing thing is the ability of the DVD camcorder to copy video rather than capture, which obviously cuts a ton of unnecessary time out of postproduction. All you have to do is pop a DVD into your DVD ROM, and without ever having to log and capture anything, you already have your video clips ready to be dragged into FinalCut, or in my case premiere. That blows my mind.
Anyway, the reason I'm writing is because I went to B&H today to take a look at the DVD camcorders I had been lusting over for several weeks, and I have a long conversation with one of the video guys who referred me to you and your web site. He said that the mini DVD medium wasn't compatible with Macintosh, and that the professionals are only now finally accepting miniDV as a widespread professional format. He said that the MPEG-2 that is recorded on the DVD camcorders is inferior quality to miniDV. When I pleaded with him about the usefulness of a nonlinear medium, he told me that in the next few years we would see camcorders that record on memory sticks that can hold maybe 10GB. If you are in the field, at the end of the day you would simply dump the memory stick on to an external 300 Gig hard drive. I thought this was pretty cool.
I was hoping I could discuss some of these issues with you, since you seem to have your finger on the pulse of new DV technology and you would probably know better than anyone what the future holds. Do you know of anyone who is actually using the DVD camcorders to create and cut piece is much more efficiently than tape?
I look forward to hearing from you. Sorry for the lengthy e-mail, I'm using Dragon NaturallySpeaking to dictate it, so I usually write way too much. (Also, if any words don't make sense, it's because I dictated them and it picked a homonym.)
-----------END email------------------
Tonight I dictated over an hour of the interviews that I recorded on my MiniDisc. I used Dragon NaturallySpeaking to dictate in almost real-time, and did almost 6000 words. The ability to talk and have your computer write what you say is one of the coolest things current technology offers. I anticipate having to transcribe hours of videotape recorded interviews in the future, so having this is a lifesaver.